A Woman to look up to

Following the Democratic Convention in July, Zach Beauchamp wrote an article for Vox outlining the impact a female president can have on the descriptive representation of women around the world. While I’m not questioning the historical significance of having the first female nominee for president from a major party, Beauchamp’s analysis of the global significance of a Hillary Clinton presidency (assuming she wins the general election in November) seems to overstate the role of US leadership when it comes to the representation of women. Why assume that young girls growing up around the world are looking up to Hillary Clinton, and not one of the over 50 women that have preceded her as heads of state?

When it comes to gender equality, the US can hardly claim leadership on any measure. 17 countries, most of them European, allowed women to serve in combat roles in the military before the Pentagon lifted its ban in 2013. And don’t even get me started on paid maternity leave, or representation in national legislatures.

While the glass ceiling is certainly still an obstacle to women seeking high political offices, and even more so in states with nuclear capabilities, I find it extremely US-centric to Suppose young girls “around the world” will look to Hillary Clinton as an example of female leadership. Many of these girls already have female role models. They’re called Sirivamo Bandaranaike, Indira Gandhi, Margaret Thatcher, and Angela Merkel.

The world has a shortage of female leaders, but let’s not pretend the US is really filling that void.


4 thoughts on “A Woman to look up to”

  1. I enjoyed reading this blog post. I wonder how having women, such as Sirivamo Bandaranaike and Angela Merkel, as heads of state affected the world’s overall view of women in power when they were elected. It would be interesting to see how the size and international clout of a country affects the descriptive representation of women around the world if that nation elects a female as head of state.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I agree – when people talk about female heads of state, it seems they typically reference either those from globally powerful nations (due to economics, military, whatever), or unexpected ones (I know people were surprised by Johnson-Sirleaf’s rise in Liberia, though that might be due to some not so great stereotypes/biases about Africa). So, there must be a middle ground – visible female leaders will be most powerful as role models, but within regions even leaders of less influential nations will presumably be able to serve that role!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s